Science Debate 2008

I'm so sick of this year's debates. You just can't get into a substantive discussion about anything---all major policy positions must be explained in 30 seconds, regardless of their complexity or history. A horrible way to run a democracy.

Personally, I'd like to see where the candidates stand on Science. Well, at least the Democratic candidates (since of course the Repubs hate science...) If you'd like to see something like this too, check out Science Debate 2008 and add your name as a supporter.

Given the many urgent scientific and technological challenges facing America and the rest of the world, the increasing need for accurate scientific information in political decision making, and the vital role scientific innovation plays in spurring economic growth and competitiveness, we call for a public debate in which the U.S. presidential candidates share their views on the issues of The Environment, Health and Medicine, and Science and Technology Policy.

Wow. This is exactly what I'm thinking. It might even expose some of the candidates whose scientific knowledge isn't all it's cracked up to be. And it'd certainly be better than some ridiculous "show of hands" to see whether or not you believe in creationism, like the Repubs have done.

If we are to survive the 21st Century, we need more focus on science, and less on religion and pseudoscience. We've got some serious issues to tackle and snake oil isn't going to solve 'em.